Is it really 3 million years old??

One of the issues we have with the Evolution THEORY is the automatic acceptance by the public about the age of fossils as reported by the "experts". There is doubtful "science" behind the process of finding the age of fossils...but there doesn't seem to be any open minded scientists willing to question their beliefs about the age of these fossils. (That is bad science!)

The biased media readily accepts whatever the scientists say, the public seems to not care about questioning it, and students are blackballed if they question what "accepted science" dictates. (Again, this is bad science!)

The definition of science is the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena. A scientist uses the principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generally involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena, experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis.

Allow me to show a valid theory AGAINST the accepted theory of the age of fossils using empirical evidence in the form of pictures. The mind must be opened in order for a "scientist" to find the Truth and we will start with this picture presentation before delving deeper into the scientific theory of fossil dating:

160,000 year old skull??

30,000 year old skull???


3 MILLION year old human jaw?????


225 MILLION year old petrified wood???


OR ...(time to open up those closed "scientific"minds!)

A petrified dog!
(Lost several, not thousands of years ago)


Common sense tells us that it doesn't take millions of years for
a fish to eat another fish...obviously these fish were buried rapidly



A fish buried in the swimming position!
Proof of rapid fossilization.
(We know this because the fins are contracted)


An EXTINCT marine reptile (Ichthyosaur) giving birth...
that doesn't take a million years!


Are there any scientists willing to argue that this piece of petrified wood was chopped AFTER petrification??

Does this fossilized bowling hat found in New Zealand prove that
bowling was invented "million and millions of years ago"??


Technorati:evolution,intelligent design,creationism,darwinism,intelligent-design,creation vs. evolution,Intelligent Design