Catholic Beliefs (Part 1)
The purpose of these posts is to clarify and reach understanding among fellow Christians to some of the issues between non-Catholics and Catholics in regards to Catholic doctrine.
We believe that tradition can blind faith if tradition is not backed by sound logic and TRUTH. Without a foundation in God's Word, error will occur, and the meaning of Christianity will be convuluded and mis-interpreted.
We will be combating some of the other outrageous attacks on Christianity (like the lies and deceit of the Da Vinci Code and others) but have come to the conclusion through much studying and research that some of the denominations of Christianity have gone astray in some of their traditions and conclusions.
This series is not intended to offend, insult, or attack anyone...but is a place to put facts as we as Christians see them and engage in a healthy debate on Christian Truth!
May the Holy Spirit guide us all and allow us to learn something new!
Part 1: The Issuse of Mary and "Perpetual" Virginity
Our question:
Why do Catholics feel a need to defend a theory about Mary's perpetual virginity that seem to serve no other purpose other than to exalt her above the fact that she was a human woman and human mother to Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ?
The Catholic Catechism states:
Mary - "ever-virgin"
499 The deepening of faith in the virginal motherhood led the Church to confess Mary's real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made man. In fact, Christ's birth "did not diminish his mother's virginal integrity but sanctified it." And so the liturgy of the Church celebrates Mary as Aeiparthenos, the "Ever-virgin".
500 Against this doctrine the objection is sometimes raised that the Bible mentions brothers and sisters of Jesus. The Church has always understood these passages as not referring to other children of the Virgin Mary. In fact James and Joseph, "brothers of Jesus", are the sons of another Mary, a disciple of Christ, whom St. Matthew significantly calls "the other Mary".
They are close relations of Jesus, according to an Old Testament expression.
501 Jesus is Mary's only son, but her spiritual motherhood extends to all men whom indeed he came to save: "The Son whom she brought forth is he whom God placed as the first-born among many brethren, that is, the faithful in whose generation and formation she co-operates with a mother's love."
THE BIBLE STATES:
Matthew 27:61
And there was Mary Magdalene, and the other Mary, sitting over against the sepulchre.
Matthew 28:1
In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
Luke 24:10
It was Mary Magdalene and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles.
AND
Matthew 13:55
Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas?
We feel that this statement should be removed immediately from the Catholic Catechism.
Mary was NOT perpetually a virgin because she gave birth to other sons!
The catechism states that there is a THIRD MARY, Mary Magdalene, the Virgin Mary, and some OTHER Mary who is the mother of James. If we check early translations, we see the words, "the other Mary" translating correctly and remaining consistent. We also find that the words in Matthew 13:55 remain the same.
Our point: What is the point of making Mary an "ever virgin"? Is it crucial to faith that there must be a third Mary in order to prove the Catholic theory of Mary's perpetual virignity correct? How is this beneficial in growing in faith in Our Lord Jesus Christ?
BUT WE UNDERSTAND HOW THIS COULD BE A PROBLEM IF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS TRYING TO MAKE MARY INTO SOMETHING MORE THAN WHO SHE IS--- A HUMAN WOMAN & A HUMAN MOTHER!
Mary was a VERY blessed woman to have received the Holy Spirit and give birth to our Messiah. I cannot underestimate the respect I have for that fact... BUT I WILL NOT add to this pseudo-Catholic religion of worshipping Mary! She was a human and died a human death.
You do not need Mary to talk to Christ and this is blasphemous to Our Lord Jesus Christ to pray to His DEAD MOTHER, instead of coming directly to Him!
Matthew 13:55
"Is this not the carpenter's son? Is not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas?"
So, the only other argument before admitting that this doctrine IS WRONG and COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE TO BUILDING FAITH IN OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST...is that it is a translation error. Well, every translation I have including the Greek and Latin translations state the same names as in Matthew 13:55 out of the English King James Version.
Here is some new information on the argument....
In 2002 a unique archaeological find was announced: a limestone ossuary (bone box) that may have held the remains of James the “brother” of Jesus.
The box dates to first century Palestine and is inscribed in Jesus’ native language, Aramaic, with the words “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.”
New attention was drawn to the ossuary by a book titled The Brother of Jesus, by Hershel Shanks and Ben Witherington. Shanks is the editor of Biblical Archaeology Review; Witherington is a New Testament professor. To publicize it, the two wrote a tie-in piece in USA Today's weekend magazine, in which Witherington (the primary author) asserted:
It is possible the inscription on the ossuary--"James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus"--provides us with a challenge in regard to some basic Christian assumptions about James.
The Roman Catholic tradition is that Jesus' brothers and sisters actually were cousins; Orthodox Christians believe they were Joseph's children by a previous marriage. The inscription conflicts with both of those Christian traditions, in fact, for there certainly was an Aramaic word for "cousin" that could have been used in this inscription but was not.
If Jesus was the son of only Mary, and James was the son of only Joseph, then Jesus and James would not literally have been brothers, as this inscription states. --"In the Name of the Brother," USA Weekend, April 13, 2003
Witherington's statement proved highly controversial. Though his characterization of Catholic teaching is not without problem, his assertion that there is an Aramaic word for cousin was egregious.
The Source of the ControversyThe New Testament is explicit that Mary was a virgin at the time she conceived Jesus by the Holy Spirit. Christian tradition--later infallibly affirmed by the Church--acknowledges that she remained a virgin afterwards. The great majority of Christians acknowledges this. Only the Protestant community dissents.
Fundamental fact: This is a "theory" that Mary remained a perpetual virgin!
Catholic theological reasoning really spun out of control on this one!
We wonder why people sell images of the Virgin Mary on toasted bread on E-Bay?
It is becasue of these "doctrines" that totally distract Catholics from biblical Truth!
We have no problem with James being the HALF brother of Jesus, James being a cousin of Jesus, or His full-blooded brother...but we do have a problem with making Mary into something more than she was and creating controversy that serves no purpose but to DISTRACT from the Truth told by OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST!
Not the truth Mary told because there IS NO TRUTH THAT MARY TOLD.
Give her credit where credit is due and STOP THERE.
The purpose of making Mary into a perpetual virgin and placing "stations" in the church to pray to Mary is absurd. We believe in the UN-CONTROVERSIAL biblical verse of several translations that MAKE TOTAL SENSE about Jesus having brothers by his mother Mary, and that she was a virgin at His birth and still lived a perfectly fine life as a blessed HUMAN mother giving birth to human children AFTER giving birth to our Lord Jesus Christ who was 100% MAN and 100% GOD.
Stop giving these Nimrod's like Dan Brown an easy reason to attack Christianity!
Our question:
Why do Catholics feel a need to defend a theory about Mary's perpetual virginity that seem to serve no other purpose other than to exhalt her above the fact that she was a human woman and human mother of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ?
Technorati: roman catholic church